Thursday, 4 July 2013

Of Love and Hunger - Julian Maclaren-Ross

It's no secret that the novels I tend to like are by women, about women, and (some would say) for women - just think of the Provincial Lady, the novels of Jane Austen, and any number of other examples.  Of course, my favourite novel is by a man (Miss Hargreaves) but I don't think anybody would guess that from reading it.  And yet, dear reader, I seem to be developing an affection for a new variety of British literature: men of the 1940s.

The first Proper Grown Up novel I ever read (besides teenage books and the odd Agatha Christie) was Nineteen Eighty-Four, at the relatively late age of 13.  I loved it then, and I loved it on re-reading it a few years ago.  It's entirely plausible that my tastes would have developed along Orwellian lines first, rather than wavering off - but better late than never, I have discovered a deep admiration for quite a few novels of the downtrodden, 1940s, lower-middle-class-hero[ine] variety. Most notably Patrick Hamilton's extremely brilliant The Slaves of Solitude - and it was my love of this novel which led Dee (from LibraryThing's Virago Modern Classics group) to send me a distinctly non-Virago novel: Of Love and Hunger (1947) by Julian Maclaren-Ross.

A long intro to a short book - Of Love and Hunger (which takes its title from Auden and MacNeice's Letters From Ireland) concerns Richard Fanshawe, a vacuum cleaner salesman who is always in debt and never in luck.  I don't believe the novel has a 'message' (it's too sophisticated for that) but this quotation does rather set the tone:
Straker said: "Doesn't seem much place for fellows like us, does there?""No.""What I mean, we're kind of out of things.  Nobody seems to want us much.  Fellows who've been out east, I mean.  We don't seem to belong any more."
Fanshawe has spent some time 'out east', and found that the return home is not a welcome for heroes.  He is stuck in a dead end job, behind with the rent on his flat, and without any particularly close friends - but, before you vow never to read a word of Of Love and Hunger, this isn't a particularly despondent novel.  Maclaren-Ross was a few years too early to be an Angry Young Man, and instead is one who embraces the bohemian, and shows the fundamental ordinariness of man.  Not the fundamental goodness - Fanshawe is not good - but nor is he bad.  He lives day to day, trying to earn his keep (and, if possible, keep his keep), and being friendly with people when he gets the chance.

One of the people he befriends is Sukie, who is (I quote the blurb) 'dark, desirable - and married to his friend'.  Which makes the novel sound a bit like a love triangle - and, although it is a bit, it's not pivotal.  More important, to my mind, are the men he meets through work.  There are some very amusing depictions of the bureaucracy and farce of vacuum selling that reminded me of John Kennedy Toole's A Confederacy of Dunces (albeit rather less hyperbolic) and I had a soft spot for Heliotrope - larger than life and twice as crooked - who is full of gusto and deceit, but a friendly face (and prolific offerer of raw onions.)

For the most part, nothing momentous happens.  Maclaren-Ross depicts an ordinary life that can't get much better and won't get much worse - the daily trundle to keep the wolf from the door, and the lack of ambition or drive that means Fanshawe will never be a rags-to-riches story (not least because he's never been as low as 'rags' implies).  But somehow Of Love and Hunger isn't hopeless.  It isn't a celebration of the everyday, or raging against it, but simply a depiction of it - and it is the truly great writers who can show us the ordinary, and wish to do no more.  I'm used to many exceptionally good (and not so good) writers doing that when 'the ordinary' is a tea table in a drawing room - I've only recently started finding them elsewhere.

It's always nice, not to mention a little ego-boosting, to read an introduction and discover that one has had the same thoughts as the Noted Expert (in this case, D.J. Taylor, who writes cogently and informatively, all too rare in introductions). I read it after I'd finished the novel, of course, and was pleased to see that he also mentioned Patrick Hamilton and George Orwell.  Of course, it was really Dee who spotted the connection, and she was right.  And fans of those writers will find much to admire in Of Love and Hunger.

15 comments:

  1. Interesting genre- men of the 40's. I always enjoyed all of Steinbeck's novels because I could taste dust b/w the pages of the American depression, farmlands and small towns. I always seemed to visit farmlands in 30's and 40's but never tea rooms. That might be a new area to travel through. Enjoyed hearing about this book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love "I always seemed to visit farmlands in 30's and 40's but never tea rooms." Excellent description!

      Delete
  2. Like you -- and probably owing to you -- I also love Hamilton and also, even more, Henry Green. I have never heard of this novel but would happily read it and I expect I will before too long. Thanks (yet again).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was indeed me who set you on the track of Hamiton, being certain that you'd like him - and Stu who set us both off reading Henry Green, I believe. I think you would enjoy this a lot - I hope you track down a copy.

      Delete
  3. "and (some would say) for women" - Simon did you follow the conversations Litlove and I had during her "women writing" month on the three books she set me to read and discuss? We missed your comments :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry I'm sorry I'm sorry! I (of course) did intend to - and still will - but the quietness on my own blog recently will show how little I've managed to spend in the blogosphere recently. I will go back and read when life is a little less hectic! I wanted to give full attention :)

      Delete
  4. Your early intro sounds a bit like "Death of a Salesman" which I note was written by a man in the 1940s (Arthur Miller in 1949). See you tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I should read that - All My Sons was so good.

      Delete
  5. Lovely review Simon - I've read some Hamilton and have this one on the mental wish-list for a while. The 1940s was an interesting era and produced a lot of good works, though I hadn't considered its own sub-genre before - intriguing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Karen! If you like Hamilton, I think you'll really enjoy this - and it probably isn't really its own sub-genre, but it is in my head!

      Delete
  6. It sounds like an interesting book so I ordered a copy. Thank you for your great review Simon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do let me know what you think when you read it, Agnieszka!

      Delete
  7. I'm so pleased you appreciated this book as much as I thought you might, Simon!

    I agree that it's wonderful to read a book which shows us the ordinary so well, and that the world of vaccuum seller salesmen makes a change from tea in middle-class dining rooms.

    I remember thinking when I started reading that the story was a slight one, but then it seemed to increase in depth the more I read until I made it to the epilogue which was a perfect ending and made me shiver.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I ordered a copy from library after reading your review; am halfway through and it's brilliant. The funny bits definitely put one in mind of Confederacy of Dunces - I love the motivational seminar for the unsuccessful vacuum cleaner salesmen; and Fanshawe's efforts to make a sale to two spinster sisters! Many thanks for advising me of a book I'd never heard of before.

    Sally Tarbox

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm so pleased that you're enjoying it! We are both indebted to Dee :)

      Delete

Thanks so much for taking the time to comment - my favourite part of blogging is reading your comments!

Annoyingly, Blogger often messes up with comments... try refreshing, or commenting Anonymously (add your name in, though!) or using Firefox/Chrome instead of Internet Explorer. (Ctrl+c your comment first!)

Failing everything, email me: simondavidthomas[at]yahoo.co.uk - or just email me anyway :)

Thanks!