This is an idle question, but perhaps an entertaining one too. I was thinking to myself, while reading a biography of Ivy Compton-Burnett, which authors I would place among the Truly Greats. There are thousands of authors who are good, hundreds who are very good, but I could only come up with a list of five whom I consider to be Great. That is, their writing is not only better than other authors', but different somehow - and so different that even imitators seem to belong to another world, or perhaps another plane.
On that list, after careful consideration, I put, in order that they wrote:
William Shakespeare
Jane Austen
Charles Dickens
Virginia Woolf
Ivy Compton-Burnett
I doubt anybody would put together this same list. I am limited to the authors I have read and that, in turn, is limited to writing in modern English. Some people might only have one name on their list; a lot would put down many more. I have not necessarily chosen my favourite authors (although three of these - the women - would qualify for that too.) That would be a substantially longer list. I have chosen the only writers whose work resonates (to me) with something extra, something special, something which sets them enormously apart from anybody else.
As I say, in some ways this is an artificial question - but I suspect some of you might have answers. And I'd be intrigued to hear them.
I agree there are great and not so great authors and after thought my greats would be:
ReplyDeleteDickens, Austen, Eliot, Charlotte Bronte, Shakespeare and Trollope. I know a lot of people will disagree with the last name on the list but he deserves to be Great for The Last Chronicle of Barset even if for no other.
Cannot get on with Virginia Woolf at any price and I have tried, oh how I have tried.....
I agree Elaine I would put Trollope on the list. In fact I think your list is my list, though I might leave C Bronte off. I admire Woolf but don't think she quite makes it, ditto ICB.
DeleteIf I had to cull this list I think perhaps charlotte might go. Just that Jane Eyre, first read at age 11, stunned me so much and set my reading pattern for life that I hold it in enormous affection
Deleteand after a comment below I add Edith Wharton. For some reason felt it had to be English writers which is a bit insular. Wharton is a Great writer, no argument
DeleteI love that this conversation has flowed between lots of people! I'm also surprised by how much people agreed, with relatively minor adjustments. I didn't expect many others to put ICB on their list, but I am going on the very subjective basis of 'a sense' I get while reading their work (!)
DeleteIf I'd read more than one book each by Wharton and Trollope, perhaps I would have added them. I loved The Warden, but it didn't seem sufficiently different from what other people have done for me to give him the epithet 'great'.
I absolute agree :) Jane Austen and Dickens are great. I would add Charlotte Bronte and John Keats. I really love Keats' poetry
ReplyDeleteMy poor efforts with poetry are definitely reflected in my list! I toyed with a Bronte, but ultimately decided against all of 'em.
DeleteMy set (not that I really hold with the concept as you know) would include
ReplyDeleteThomas Mann, Tolstoy, Colette, Gunter Grass, Murakami and, for her novel Middlemarch, I'd also add Evans. If you want a poet too then it has to be Sappho.
What a typically (for DP) international bunch. But are we to include all these foreigners?
DeleteSimon only specified "Great Writers". I haven't read as extensively native English speakers of the "great" variety as he (and the rest of you) has. For example only a few plays of Shakespeare and only a couple of sonnets, three books by Dickens, nothing by Austen or a Bronte nor Trollope.
DeleteI actually think it would be better to try to confine it to writers in English. Otherwise the field is too large!
DeleteI am more than happy to allow foreigners on people's lists! I just haven't read enough of them to put any on mine - and no non-English works in their original language. (Does that affect a judgement of greatness, do you think? Peter, I assume some of those you've only read in translation?)
DeleteThank you for playing, Peter, despite not holding with such concepts! And, while I can't promise you'd love Austen, I feel fairly sure you'd like The Warden (the only Trollope I have read.)
And Simon, have you read Trollope? and if not, why not?
ReplyDeleteI have - only The Warden, which I loved. But I wouldn't put him on my list based on that... And I deliberately left off all the Brontes too, because (in my opinion) they don't cross from Very Good to Great. But there is, of course, a lot of subjectivity to this!
DeleteOh, poor Milton!
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I could not name just five. Besides, I am Italian, and it would come natural to me to go both national and international. So I pass, it is too difficult.
There's no need to restrict to five, that was just the number I came up with for my list!
DeleteI don't disagree with any of those mentioned really -- just putting in a 2nd vote for Tolstoy. I can't think of a writer larger in his themes or more telling in the details. And a vote for Chekhov. And the not so great writer Dostoevsky who produced the great Brothers Karamazov.
ReplyDeleteI must familiarise myself better with the Russians... their absence is only because I have read nothing by Tolstoy, two short books by Dostoevsky, and a play by Chekhov...
DeleteDon't forget Chaucer. Tolstoy sprang to mind immediately but, much as love Trollope and the Brontes, I don't think they're on the A-list.
ReplyDeleteI did ponder on Chaucer, but for my money, the Gawain poet is closer to greatness. But I am very ignorant on Middle English, so that is just my instinctive reading, really!
DeleteApart from Shakespeare, I've not read enough of the others to say whether they were great or not, but I would err towards Tolstoy. But what of later 20thC greats - Only DP mentions any. But who to suggest - Graham Greene anyone?
ReplyDeleteI was tempted to include Greene, but I have only read a couple of his books. Clearly distance lends some clarity perhaps to whom we might consider "Great", though I have no hesitation with Murakami.
DeleteI agree that distance lends clarity. Struggle to think of anybody today who counts as great in the Shakespeare/Dickens/Austen mould. (In fairness, think of the time-lapse between them.) Greene and Hardy very tempting to include as borderline great!
DeleteDoes great have to = bulk? What about the one perfect novel? (Was thinking of Il Gattopardo.)
I couldn't think of anybody modern! Muriel Spark I wondered about, and decided against. But the biggest gap there is between Shakespeare and Jane Austen, where I have centuries without anybody!
DeleteAnd very good question, Mary. I don't think quantity really matters when it comes to greatness. Emma or Our Mutual Friend or Much Ado About Nothing would each be enough to ensure greatness, to my mind.
I like your point about 'difference' being a key to one's list. I still haven't read any ICB (yet!) but a definite 'yes' to your other four. Purely in terms of difference, I might suggest (wholly unpopularly, of course), DH Lawrence. *ducks*
ReplyDeleteThat was the fundamental aspect for me, Vicki. And probably why I wouldn't include DHL (whom I often like) based on the books I've read, which don't seem vastly different from other novelists of his and later periods. ICB's strength is her distinctness, I think.
DeleteI have been following your blog ever since I started my own blog. Your layout is so stunning! And this question is really making my head spin. I have taken the summer to read (and in some cases, re-read) the works of Thomas Hardy. It is taking a long time because I am so immersed in them. They transport me to a time and place that I love. I am reading "Far From the Madding Crowd" aloud, because I don't want to miss one word. For sure, there is no answer to your question. Books are so personal. But what a lovely question to mull over. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteBetty (Betty's video book blog)
Thank you very much, Betty! Going to your blog, I see that we have the same layout - I started with the birds, and then changed the background and fonts, colours etc., and added a header - but we started from the same point! ;)
DeleteI rather like your choices, although I am not entirely sure Ivy makes the leap from very, very good to great. (Sorry!) At the international level, I think Cervantes, Tolstoy, Thomas Mann and Proust make the grade. The usual suspect, it strikes me though.
ReplyDeleteAnd I am really working hard to restrain myself from adding all of my personal favourites.
I am delighted that anybody thinks her very, very good, believe me! It is interesting that so many of the greats we each have contributed are tried and true. If the question had been favourites, I suspect it would have been a much more varied and eclectic group - my suggestions would certainly have been very different.
DeleteWow, this is going to be personal - but if we are talking about resonating and individualism I would say:
ReplyDeleteVirginia Woolf
Italo Calvino
Dostoevsky
Kerouac
Colette
But the list would no doubt change on any given day....
Great list, Karen - I'm intrigued to see Kerouac there, as I hadn't thought of him in that mould.
DeleteSimon, you've made my head ache!
ReplyDeleteI can never distill to my FAVORITES on any sort of list - I simply have too many favorites, for various reasons. I agree with you on Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Virginia Woolf and Ivy Compton Burnett. I agree with several other comments on their additions.
How about great genre writers? Agatha Christie and Dorothy L. Sayers, for example. Or E. F. Benson and Angela Thirkell?
My favourites would be a different list, indeed! But how nice to overlap so much :)
DeleteI did ponder on including Christie, because she is a genius for plotting and might deserve to be there for that reason. She was very close.
I completely agree about Austen and Shakespeare, but am less convinced about the others on your list. I think they are amazing stylists but I'm not quite sure that is the same thing as being Great. I'd add another vote for Tolstoy and probably throw Zola in there too.
ReplyDeleteThat is such an interesting point, Claire - I hadn't realised it until you said, but I did indeed include three for style and two for character (with style an added bonus). But I think being a great stylist is probably the same as being great in my mind, because it is what I prize most in a writer.
DeleteI note only one reference to Hardy - so I'll double his showing. I wonder whether the foreign authors are included because of their themes or their language, in which case do translators ever get much of a look in? Several reviews of Clive James' version of Dante around at the moment being compared with others.
ReplyDeleteHow much does someone need to write to be 'great'? and do they have to produce several 'great' works?
You've even made me think about novels Si.
Success, Dad! Pleased to see you championing Thomas :)
DeleteAnd an excellent point about translators - which would put me off adding anybody I hadn't read in the original. As for how much... I think one great work would make a great writer.
I would say:
ReplyDeleteVirginia Woolf
Shakespeare
Tolstoy
F. S. Fitzgerald
Dostoiwesky
Thanks for your list! The only person to mention Fitzgerald, I note - but I imagine a lot of people would agree with you.
DeleteFor me Elizabeth Taylor is a 'great' writer. I will always re-read her, I think. Her writing is so good, it frequently astounds me.
ReplyDeleteI was expecting more suggestions of that type! I think she is very, very good, but perhaps a very good version of a fairly common approach. Not sure. I do need to read more.
DeleteYes, Elizabeth Taylor is amazing. Her novels are great-worthy.
ReplyDeleteErica will be pleased to be cheered on!
DeleteI can't argue with Austen and Dickens, but am still pondering who my other three might be. Woolf would definitely NOT be on my list. Am also considering others' comments about what makes the author "great." Clearly Austen wasn't as prolific as Dickens, but Trollope is not only very good, he was more prolific than Dickens if memory serves. So is it a matter of quality of writing alone, or does quality in great quantity get them bonus points? Ah, stuff to sit and ponder...
ReplyDeleteYou can have more than five if you like, Susan :) (or does that make things more complicated still?!) I'm unsure on quantity - but if a great writer also writers lesser works, that might affect things? (Then again, some of Shakespeare's plays are not, to my mind, great... I'm thinking Comedy of Errors, for example.)
DeleteAgree with Jane Austen, Shakespeare and Dickens. Suggest Thackeray - for Vanity Fair alone he is in the first rank. George Eliot also gets my vote. I am confining myself to writers in English. Having said that, what about the Americans? Edith Wharton, Henry James etc.
ReplyDeleteI think Trollope is superb, but not in the first five nor are the Brontes.
Sue
I am so poorly read in American literature that I haven't included any - further afield, though, I was tempted to include Katherine Mansfield...
DeleteYou doubt anybody would put together this same list? You are wrong.
ReplyDeleteI would - only Betty MacDonald would be also included.